VoteScope Labs · Updated October 4, 2026

Orbit Live experiment QuantumRelativisticQubits

What if you forecast an election with Einstein’s physics?

Orbit is our experimental engine. It reads exactly the same polls as our reference forecast, but with completely different machinery: opinion travels on a curved sphere, like a planet on its orbit, and seats are counted with qubits instead of dice. Every night, both engines run side by side. When they agree, the signal is strong. When they clash, that is where it gets interesting.

Read the full explanation →

Everywhere Orbit is running

Seats won: the number of ridings where each party is the favourite. The top bar is Orbit, our quantum engine; the middle one, Harfang des neiges, our classical model; the bottom one, a 50/50 blend of both.

They agree · 7 Same winner, different call on the majority · 3 They disagree: different winner · 0

Quebec 2026

Chance of a majority: 37% · Harfang 29%

Same winner, different call on the majority

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Majority: 64
See the forecast →

British Columbia 2026

Chance of a majority: 57% · Harfang 73%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Majority: 47
See the forecast →

Canada (federal)

Chance of a majority: > 99% · Harfang > 99%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Majority: 172
See the forecast →

Ontario

Chance of a majority: 76% · Harfang 74%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Majority: 63
See the forecast →

United Kingdom

Chance of a majority: 38% · Harfang 6%

Same winner, different call on the majority

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
Majority: 326
See the forecast →

French presidential 2027

Chance of winning: 97% · Harfang > 99%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
See the forecast →

French legislative election

Chance of a majority: 62% · Harfang 45%

Same winner, different call on the majority

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
Majority: 289
See the forecast →

U.S. Senate 2026

Chance of control: 56% · Harfang 64%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Control: 51
See the forecast →

U.S. House 2026

Chance of control: 85% · Harfang 96%

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Control: 218
See the forecast →

U.S. Governors 2026

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
See the forecast →

The test of the past

We replayed past elections using only the polls known the day before the vote. Here is the average gap, per party, between projected seats won and the real results — the same measure as our track record. Lower is better.

ElectionOrbit gapHarfang gapRidings called right (Orbit)
British Columbia 2024 1.3 not replayed 86%
Quebec 2022 1.6 1.8 92%
Quebec 2018 4.0 6.5 82%

How Orbit works, in three ideas

1

Opinion travels on a sphere

A 2-point gain does not mean the same thing for a party at 5% and a party at 40%. By placing opinion on a curved sphere, Orbit knows this by instinct, and it carries the national swing to each riding the way you carry an arrow across a globe.

2

Polls are measurements

As in quantum physics, each poll is a measurement of a hidden state: the electorate. Orbit tracks that state day after day, erases each pollster’s own lean and lets no one dictate the average alone.

3

Qubits instead of dice

Each riding becomes a small quantum register. Instead of rolling dice 50,000 times, Orbit counts the seats exactly, in seconds. A real quantum circuit gives the same answer, to the billionth.

Read the full explanation →