VoteScope Labs · Updated October 4, 2026

Orbit Live experiment QuantumRelativisticQubits

Ontario

Same polls, different physics. Here is what Orbit, our quantum engine, sees next to Harfang des neiges, our classical model.

Orbit’s favourite

PC
94% chance of finishing first

Seats won

77Harfang 67 8 in 10 chance between 52 and 89

Chance of a majority (63)

76%Harfang 74% PC

Same favourite as Harfang des neiges

92% of ridings

Orbit (quantum) vs. Harfang des neiges (classical): do they agree?

They agree

Orbit (quantum)
Harfang (classical)
50/50 blend
Majority: 63
  • PC
  • NDP
  • OLP
  • GP
  • OTH

What if we listened to both engines at once?

50/50 blend: PC 68 · Chance of a majority75%

The blend gives each riding the average of the chances announced by Orbit and by our reference forecast, then counts the favourites. In our Quebec replays (2018 and 2022, the day before the vote), the blend always beat the reference forecast alone: in 2018 the error drops from 6.5 to 4.5 seats, and the announced probabilities become far more reliable. The 50/50 split is a choice of principle, not a setting tuned on those two elections. October 5 will be its first real blind test.

Party by party

PC +10 Harfang
77
Vote
42.3%
Vote Harfang
40.3%
Chance of a majority
76%
NDP = Harfang
28
Vote
21.4%
Vote Harfang
20.7%
Chance of a majority
< 1%
OLP −10 Harfang
16
Vote
30.0%
Vote Harfang
33.8%
Chance of a majority
< 1%
GP = Harfang
2
Vote
2.5%
Vote Harfang
2.1%
Chance of a majority
< 1%
OTH = Harfang
1
Vote
3.8%
Vote Harfang
3.1%
Chance of a majority
< 1%

The vote, with its margin of uncertainty

The solid bar is Orbit’s projected vote; the thin line, an 8-in-10 range; the black tick, our reference forecast.

  • PC 42.3%
  • OLP 30.0%
  • NDP 21.4%
  • OTH 3.8%
  • GP 2.5%

Where the two engines disagree

  • Eglinton—Lawrence Orbit (quantum): PC · 56% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Etobicoke-Centre Orbit (quantum): PC · 70% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Hamilton Mountain Orbit (quantum): PC · 45% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Mississauga-Est—Cooksville Orbit (quantum): PC · 57% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Mississauga—Lakeshore Orbit (quantum): PC · 59% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Mississauga—Streetsville Orbit (quantum): PC · 61% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Oakville Orbit (quantum): PC · 59% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Scarborough-Centre Orbit (quantum): PC · 59% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • Willowdale Orbit (quantum): PC · 59% Harfang (classical): OLP
  • York-Sud—Weston Orbit (quantum): PC · 45% Harfang (classical): OLP

Orbit’s instruments

Voters who switched sides since the last election

4.0 at least, in points of the electorate

Average gap between pollsters

± 1.6 points, around the most likely state

Horizon

Election today No election date set: forecast if the election were held today, like our reference forecast.

How Orbit works, in three ideas

Opinion travels on a sphere

A 2-point gain does not mean the same thing for a party at 5% and a party at 40%. By placing opinion on a curved sphere, Orbit knows this by instinct, and it carries the national swing to each riding the way you carry an arrow across a globe.

Polls are measurements

As in quantum physics, each poll is a measurement of a hidden state: the electorate. Orbit tracks that state day after day, erases each pollster’s own lean and lets no one dictate the average alone.

Qubits instead of dice

Each riding becomes a small quantum register. Instead of rolling dice 50,000 times, Orbit counts the seats exactly, in seconds. A real quantum circuit gives the same answer, to the billionth.

Read the full explanation →